Skip to content

feat: Annotate CRDs with Controller version #602

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

michaelhtm
Copy link
Member

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@ack-prow ack-prow bot requested review from a-hilaly and knottnt June 10, 2025 19:03
Copy link

ack-prow bot commented Jun 10, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: michaelhtm

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ack-prow ack-prow bot added the approved label Jun 10, 2025
if len(args) != 1 {
return fmt.Errorf("please specify the service alias for the AWS service API to generate")
if len(args) < 1 {
return fmt.Errorf("please specify the service alias for the AWS service API to generate: controller")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why add the post fix : controller

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just needed to see where the error is coming from..we have this exact error message in 3 different places.
Maybe it can be handled in a different PR

@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ type {{ .CRD.Kind }}Status struct {
// {{ .CRD.Kind }} is the Schema for the {{ .CRD.Plural }} API
// +kubebuilder:object:root=true
// +kubebuilder:subresource:status
// +kubebuilder:metadata:annotations="controller-version={{ .ReleaseVersion }}"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice, TIL

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just leaving thoughts here: another way would've been to modify the release script instead, and leverage yq to inject the annotation. But i pref what you're doing here

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this might be the better approach..since we don't run make build-controller when we do releases, the latest release version may not be annotated..Maybe i should add a controller-gen command here as well

@michaelhtm
Copy link
Member Author

/test efs-controller-test

Copy link

ack-prow bot commented Jun 10, 2025

@michaelhtm: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
verify-attribution 2db5bbf link false /test verify-attribution
s3-olm-test 2db5bbf link false /test s3-olm-test
ec2-controller-test 2db5bbf link true /test ec2-controller-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants